Does she suck on lemons before each press conference or is that just her face?
Steecie41 on
The Daily who???
timesfive on
I thought the MSM was against Trump and all he does? By their logic, this report is just another lie to frame Trump for not, not writing the letter. 4-D chess here y’all.
ragingclaw on
Look, my neighbors sister-in-law’s third cousin’s ex-wife’s brother from her third marriage said that their uncle knew a guy that said its totally not his signature, OK. /s
LiberalBanter on
Handwriting experts are bullshit charlatans. But Leavitt knows that. She’s just counting on brain dead republicans to believe this. And to be fair, she’s not wrong on that count.
JangSaverem on
The administration is now getting Their propaganda from the ultra far right propaganda tabloids…
AND SPEAKING IT AS TRUTH
TopEagle4012 on
No matter what he does, how morally reprehensible his behavior, how many times he lies, cheats, steals, molests, rapes, etc. she will say he is an angel. He never did any of those things. You are all just making everything up because you hate how wonderful he is and all the incredible things he’s doing for the country. Her name needs to be chiseled along with all the other sycophants as the worst of the worst.
Significant-City-896 on
What’s it going to take before his followers stop buying into this bullshit. It’s really unbelievable and sad
Cyrix_FPU_FTW on
I endured the eye-herpes called “Daily Signal” so you didn’t have to. The story does not exist. She confused it for the Daily Wire, and then LIED about the experts – it was three separate AI engines; [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leavitt-cites-funniest-handwriting-experts-210947248.html](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leavitt-cites-funniest-handwriting-experts-210947248.html)
>The Daily Wire, for instance, did not cite “three separate signature analysts,” It cited three “AI research systems”—which did not remark, at all, on Trump’s signature, but rather compared the diction in the 2003 letter to Trump’s other publicly available writings. The AI models apparently cast doubt on the note’s authenticity, finding it inconsistent with the president’s speech habits (namely, too “sophisticated” for Trump).
>And the AI models’ conclusions are quite dubious. For example, although the AI systems flagged that the 2003 letter employs third-person narration, words like “enigma,” and a theatrical opening line (“There must be more to life than having everything”), these by no means prove Trump was not the author.
Portland-to-Vt on
He wrote it. Spin it a different direction if you’d like, chalk it up to “secret locker room banter” if you will “boyish swagger raping” if you will but we’re well past ‘didn’t do it’ . You can sell it however you’d like but we are well past “NOT HIM” it is, it was.
Vegetableau on
Barbie was much better looking when I was a kid.
FilthyPuns on
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
George Orwell, 1984
Freebird_1957 on
The Daily Signal 😆
Rechabees on
I’m partial to referring to her as The Taco Belle.
ChickenandWhiskey on
All it takes is one contrary news story and they latch on.
Just like the shitty polls.
SilverGnarwhal on
The handwriting experts:
missrachelifyounasty on
We all know it’s his signature.
0NiceMarmot on
So “Daily Signal” is essentially the administration.
snark_enterprises on
Lol, nobody is buying this shit. These people are so pathetic.
stuckinhere-2136 on
Propaganda Piggy. For fucks sake stop acting like she’s attractive.
28 Comments
https://preview.redd.it/qss4vfhry7of1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c15f1d56a102ef4d856270edf7eace308ffeac9e
Same, girl, same. 😬
Does she suck on lemons before each press conference or is that just her face?
The Daily who???
I thought the MSM was against Trump and all he does? By their logic, this report is just another lie to frame Trump for not, not writing the letter. 4-D chess here y’all.
Look, my neighbors sister-in-law’s third cousin’s ex-wife’s brother from her third marriage said that their uncle knew a guy that said its totally not his signature, OK. /s
Handwriting experts are bullshit charlatans. But Leavitt knows that. She’s just counting on brain dead republicans to believe this. And to be fair, she’s not wrong on that count.
The administration is now getting Their propaganda from the ultra far right propaganda tabloids…
AND SPEAKING IT AS TRUTH
No matter what he does, how morally reprehensible his behavior, how many times he lies, cheats, steals, molests, rapes, etc. she will say he is an angel. He never did any of those things. You are all just making everything up because you hate how wonderful he is and all the incredible things he’s doing for the country. Her name needs to be chiseled along with all the other sycophants as the worst of the worst.
What’s it going to take before his followers stop buying into this bullshit. It’s really unbelievable and sad
I endured the eye-herpes called “Daily Signal” so you didn’t have to. The story does not exist. She confused it for the Daily Wire, and then LIED about the experts – it was three separate AI engines; [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leavitt-cites-funniest-handwriting-experts-210947248.html](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/leavitt-cites-funniest-handwriting-experts-210947248.html)
>The Daily Wire, for instance, did not cite “three separate signature analysts,” It cited three “AI research systems”—which did not remark, at all, on Trump’s signature, but rather compared the diction in the 2003 letter to Trump’s other publicly available writings. The AI models apparently cast doubt on the note’s authenticity, finding it inconsistent with the president’s speech habits (namely, too “sophisticated” for Trump).
>And the AI models’ conclusions are quite dubious. For example, although the AI systems flagged that the 2003 letter employs third-person narration, words like “enigma,” and a theatrical opening line (“There must be more to life than having everything”), these by no means prove Trump was not the author.
He wrote it. Spin it a different direction if you’d like, chalk it up to “secret locker room banter” if you will “boyish swagger raping” if you will but we’re well past ‘didn’t do it’ . You can sell it however you’d like but we are well past “NOT HIM” it is, it was.
Barbie was much better looking when I was a kid.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
George Orwell, 1984
The Daily Signal 😆
I’m partial to referring to her as The Taco Belle.
All it takes is one contrary news story and they latch on.
Just like the shitty polls.
The handwriting experts:
We all know it’s his signature.
So “Daily Signal” is essentially the administration.
Lol, nobody is buying this shit. These people are so pathetic.
Propaganda Piggy. For fucks sake stop acting like she’s attractive.
The Daily Signal holy shit
Now you can take her home with you!
https://preview.redd.it/zfsk00rjd8of1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6f47dbce70c515b972b79fb0d690a8b7969c1907
Why would the authenticate a hoax?!?!
I think it’s the same reason DJT was an FBI informant! /s
Three seperate analysts: Gym Pedo, Gomer, and Matt Gaetz.
But it doesnt matter if it is his signature because the letter doesnt exist and because it’s a hoax and Biden and Obama wrote the letter.
there are three kinds of lies: Lies. Damn lies. and any thing Leavitt says
So, let me see if I understand correctly:
The Heritage Foundation owns the Daily Signal, and said that the signature on the B-Day card is not Trump’s.
The Heritage Foundation president started Project 25, which is the handbook that Trump is using.
What am I missing here? There’s something there, but I quite don’t get it.